Or is it?
more to come....
Comment if you still believe in Blog.
Blog believes in you.
Thursday, July 13, 2023
Saturday, April 25, 2020
How's Your Pandemic?
How’s your pandemic?
Good, I hope.
Or as good/safe as it can be. Mine is progressing nicely. Staying at home/self-isolating is not a fun thing. But it is important and hopefully will serve the purpose it is meant to serve: Keep more people healthy, and our hospitals and clinics running (and not overwhelmed). The vast majority of folks I know and hear from are healthy, employed and if anything, stir-crazy and bored. I wish the same for you, too.
As of Sunday, 4/19 (National Garlic Day, yes?) I have been working at home for one whole month.
Benefits/Silver-Linings, for me
1. Being deemed an “essential” worker and being able to stay employed helping people remotely with my IT day job, full time out of my basement. (Although I got word I will be going back onsite, at least temporarily, next week.)
A photo of UMN taken last week, sans people |
2. More family time with my spouse and son.
4. Better Monday – Friday commute.
5. Saved $ on gas, eating out, parking fees, etc.
6. More neighborhood walks, more watching the birds and animals in my back yard.
7. More binge-watching cable/streaming TV shows, such as (in the order I most enjoyed them):
c. Outlander (Starz)
f. Ozark (Netflix)
8. Coming soon – more gardening/yard work time; More fishing time.
9. Increased face mask time.
10. Very clean hands.
11. More virtual happy hours, MTG (Magic The Gathering) and Heroclix games (Thank you ZOOM and ROLL20) with friends—some of whom I am seeing now more than if a pandemic weren’t happening.
12. On some nights, less sleep, but mostly on others more sleep, and more dreams… some hopeful and some scary, but most with a subtext of “freedom.”
Downsides, for me
1. My writing desk now doubles as my 40-hour per week work desk. (True, I’m guessing for many writers out there.) My home office loses its appeal after enough days in a row spent in it.
2. More family time. Yeah, we’re all great, but there is something to be said about time apart once in a while, too. I feel for my teenager who I’m sure would rather be having a lot more in-person time with kids his age—vs. his parents. (Again, thank you ZOOM so he can carry on virtually with his youth group and D&D sessions.)
3. Fewer (and good) reasons for NOT going out in the world and having actual interaction with real, in-person people. (Like many people, my introvert side feels this.)
4. Seeing empty shelves in my neighborhood stores – in some cases devoid of paper products, red meat, cold medicine, potatoes, rice, etc. Not something I thought I’d ever experience in the USA. (That being said my family and I have lacked for nothing that matters.)
5. Less exercise each day. In my day job I can walk 13-14K steps in a busy day. Now 3,000 steps a day is more typical.
6. More couch/chair time. (See #5 above.)
7. More TV/movie viewing time. A couple recent disappointments, for me:
8. Seeing stories of sick, suffering people on the news and deaths worldwide from this scary new illness. I do know a handful of sick (Covid19-related) distant friends, acquaintances and friends of friends. I don’t like you/them sick! So far, they seem to be on the mend, which I am grateful for. But it is a terrible sickness, and I wish anyone suffering from it health and a speedy recovery.
9. Having parents who are in the age demographic most likely to be affected by the corona virus. I am thankful they are staying in, and thankful for my sister who is helping them often with grocery shopping and the like. I talk to them by phone, but will be happy when I can see them in person again. (Maybe in late May?)
10. So far, the covidpocalypse pales in comparison to many of my favorite apocalypse books and movies… which is a good thing! But they are always on my mind in our odd, cooped-up reality that we are living in:
· The Stand
· The Road
· I am Legend
· 12 Monkeys
· The Matrix
· Night of the Living Dead
· 28 Days Later
· Mad Max/Road Warrior
11. My writing time, effort, energy and motivation is low, lately. This would probably be true in any reality (just not feeling it these days), but—I believe in Maslow’s hierarchy of needs—if your world is turned upside down and you have to worry about health and security, it doesn’t leave anyone (me) with much mental space to be creative. But, I am working on it. Hey, I even wrote a blog post….
So, in conclusion I feel fortunate for how things are going for my family, friends and me during this trying, weird, dangerous time that this fiction writer never would have predicted. (My pandemic story has vampires—but you can go out in the daylight anywhere you want—with friends!) I’m getting through this, and I hope you are, too. Please continue to stay healthy, inside and stay safe.
For my writer friends: I hope you are finding ways to make time and space for writing now, or at least finding inspiration for future pages to be written. And—if you have any hints to help light a writing fire under me, please share them.
So how is your pandemic going? Let me know.
Mark
@manowords
@manowords
Saturday, May 18, 2019
Word Play – All Hail The King
In the shadow of
the US Bank Stadium, writers, readers and book peddlers gather in the make
shift Minneapolis tent village, crowding the closed streets, haggling over
words, sentences and paragraphs, and whispering in hushed tones, “Soon the
master will be here.”
“Imagine” by John
Lennon is being piped out over the crowd when I show up. And I wonder if these
are the same people who sold out First
Avenue last night to hear the Rock
Bottom Remainders. I suspect they are. Why should they be any different
from me? Here to witness the same phenomenon, the head horror writer in charge,
Lovecraft’s current channeler on earth—Stephen
King.
He doesn’t go on
until 10 AM, so I pick out a spot fairly close to the stage, but far enough
back I’m out of the crowd—at least for now. The morning is relatively pleasant.
It’s sunny, there’s a spring breeze, classic rock plays along with a steady
bongo drumbeat somewhere that has me thinking “Renaissance Festival for
Writers.” Commercial interests are represented, mostly by Target reps in red
shirts that hand out sunscreen and sunglasses, all with the Target logo.
I scan the crowd
for writers I know—and come up empty. But there are enough people here they
could easily be hidden in the growing mass of people. “I Feel Like Making Love”
comes on, and the Ren Fest feeling now gives way to more of a “carnival for writers”
vibe. I also think that in a King novel (Cell,
for instance) this would be the moment right before it all goes bad, before
people start going mad and biting each other. I take a step further back from
the growing crowd, eye-up the exits.
A woman in the crowd asks me how Instagram works on her phone (I’m no help). Another woman,
about four feet tall and at least eighty years old, leans close to me, enjoying
the shade I provide. When I take a step away, she moves closer again. My toes
are run over by a stroller filled with two sleeping infants and their mom yells
“toes!” in surprise, and jokes with me that “You probably didn’t need those
anyway.” No harm done, I concur. There are clearly a variety of people here,
and most of them, it seems, are here just like me, readers or writers, waiting to
see King.
“Dangerous Type”
by the Cars plays now. Somewhere past the wall of people, King must make a brief
appearance as he heads towards stage. A flurry of hands and cheers all go up at
once, and stop just as suddenly as he ducks out of site. I can’t help but
wonder if this is where fame gets you. People yelling and waving at just a
slight glimpse. There are so many of us now in this crowd, my mind jumps to a
scene in Jesus Christ Superstar:
Jesus and the Lepers. “There are so many of you!” I hope King gets something
worthwhile from this—besides big bags of writer superstar money, that is. I
hope it’s worth it.
When King is
finally introduced and makes it on stage I mostly see him on the big projection
screen they have set up. He has a casual manner, and a wide, friendly smile. He
shows his age a little: gray hair, a bit bent of posture, very soft-spoken.
Benjamin
Percy, local author (of some fine books like Thrill Me and Red Moon) interviews
King, with full disclosure, that they will mostly talk about one of King’s
newer books, The Outsider (I’ve read
it, not bad—the first two-thirds were great, the ending felt familiar to me,
reminiscent of It).
King is so much
fun to listen to, and between him and Percy they had some great things to say
about reading and writing and horror. Here are a few gems (tried to capture as
best I could, please consider most of what follows “paraphrased”):
·
King complimented the crowd for being “People
who read shit.” (Meaning: great that they are readers)
·
“If you can read and write you can own the
f•cking world.” - Stephen King
·
He spoke of how many people have written him to
say our current president reminds them of Greg Stillson, the president in his
book The Dead Zone (The first thing I
thought of when Trump was elected.)
·
A few times he talked about how his books end,
in this manner: “I’ll find out the ending in the course of writing the book.”
·
He’s a Game
of Thrones fan.
·
Random thought/observation: The closed
captioning at this event was bordering on hilarious. I’m sure it’s tough—I
couldn’t keep up if I were typing, but here are a few captions I noticed that
made me smile:
o Supernatural
Beans (beings)
o Needful
Chinks (things)
o Swagger
(Jimmy Swaggart)
o Kid
tanning on the window (tapping)
·
Some projects King has in the works
o A
sequel (perhaps) to Salems’ Lot
o The Outsider will be a Netflix series
o If It Bleeds (new novel coming out soon—it
sounds good!)
·
A joke by King: “So far so good: What the guy who jumped off the roof said
as he was passing the 40th floor.”
·
What does King write about? He says he writes to
the point that monsters are real—and sometimes they win. He likes to write
about people falling apart. He also talked about how all people have secrets,
and used the example of Ted Bundy, who did terrible things yet to most people
around him, they only saw a handsome, charming guy. He also uses his writing to
pass on his fears and traumas to others (why pay a psychiatrist when people pay
him to read his fears).
·
King also spoke about how in these (current, terrible,
scary) times people are frightened, and that writers have a responsibility to
write about what frightens them.
o His
upcoming book If It Bleeds may
express some fears about Alzheimer’s and dementia. (A writer’s tool is his
mind…)
·
Some things that King spoke of fondly:
o Wait Until Dark (an old movie with Audrey
Hepburn)
o The Shrinking Man (Incredible Shrinking Man)
·
On fame: “Writers should be like Clark Kent.”
·
“Minnesota is a great place. You’re lucky to
live here.” – Stephen King
·
“It’s a strange life.” – Stephen King
·
How good writing should be: “A hem stitched so
fine…” (meaning so well written people can suspend belief)
·
Side note by King and Percy: the director, John
Carpenter, apparently keeps a “File of Scares’—creepy images—that he uses to
work from.
As King spoke the crowd grew. Some
of the most interesting people in the audience, to me, were the ones who walked
on by, who never looked at King up on stage, or even paused. One of the most
popular writers on the planet is up on stage—and you can’t stop to listen in
for a minute? I just don’t understand.
This is my third
time being in a King audience—and I love to listen to him expound about
writing. But why shouldn’t I, as someone who has read 40+ Stephen King books?
I’m plenty biased.
One other moment I
got to experience, thanks to The Loft’s Word
Play event (and my thoughtful wife who bought us tickets for our anniversary),
was to hear King and the Rockbottom
Remainders play a blend of classic rock songs, most that I recognized as cover
tunes from my father’s old record collection. Hearing this group of writers
sing “Paper Back Writer” was wonderful, and as another writer friend of mine
said, “Hearing King sing Stand By Me
was a dream come true I never knew I had.”
Ditto.
~Mark
@manOwords
@manOwords
Labels:
Conferences,
Horror,
Mark,
Percy,
Rock and/or Roll,
Stephen King,
writing
2018 - In Remembrance
On this blog, you won’t find any entries to mark 2018’s passage. Some say this year didn’t happen—but I am here to tell you, it did.
For me, 2018 was a year of changes. For one, I was on a
break between full-time jobs. Late 2017 my IT Manager job of many years ended
abruptly in a financial lay off that took about 40% of staff with it. The good
news is this layoff came with six months of severance pay so I could take my
time to figure out what to do next.
The first half of 2018, for me, was kind of a test run on
other jobs, and maybe also a test run on what it will be like (for me) to be
retired. I hope I make it to see that day, because I really enjoyed the
taste of it I had in 2018. During that time I got to explore new opportunities,
but also spend my time doing only exactly what I wanted. It was liberating.
A few things I can vouch for, that happened (in my life) in
2018:
- Being an Intro to Creative Writing teacher—which I loved. I am so appreciative of the whole experience: Hamline University, my students, and my fellow teachers—and the whole chance to be emerged in thinking about/teaching/talking writing.
- Job hunting: Writing resumes, going on interviews, taking career assessments, attending job fairs and networking lunches and coffees.
- Getting a new job as a tech geek at UMN
- Living life. 2018 had graduation parties, a funeral, a wedding, a car crash, birthday celebrations, and a retirement. I also played billiards, climbed a rock wall, and attended a couple rock concerts.
- Writing: much of my writing in 2018 revolved around starting my thesis. As my thesis project I chose, Sunlight, my book project that I’ve written about in this blog a few times. Through thesis I added to, revised and honed the first third of this book—and got lots of feedback on it from my professors, but also members of the Scribblerati. And our writing group met to talk writing and give each other feedback 4 times (that I can recall in 2018).
What was 2018 for the other Scribblerati? For you? Anything
you’d like to remember—or forget about it?
I look forward to your comments on a year I know happened,
when blogging didn’t.
Mark
@manOwords
Saturday, August 26, 2017
The Girl Has No Head
My local coffee shop has a blackboard they dedicate, most of
the time, to some question like, “If you could be any animal, what would you
be?” and “What’s the best movie of all time?” and “Who is your favorite member
of Imagine Dragons?” Patrons then scribble their answers on the board as they wait around for their coffee order.
This week, when I stopped by to get my local caffeine infusion,
on the blackboard they had instead drawn an elaborate illustration of the process
it takes the pea berry to get from somewhere in Brazil, to be turned into coffee and made into the delicious brew that ends up in my paper coffee
cup. For the most part the drawing was a masterpiece of chalk, but I couldn't help but notice.... in the middle of the illustration, was this figure:
This raises a lot of questions.
What exactly is going on in this little scene?
- Is it really a girl?
- Is her head missing?
- If so, is the lack of head intentional? A forgotten detail in this chalk masterpiece? A result of some terrible accident?
- What does the lack of head say about the artist? About this coffee shop? The coffee industry?
This drawing of a headless coffee sorter made me think of
writing, and how an author sometimes fails to describe a scene completely, or accidentally leaves out details, that leave the reader wondering, and confused.
Amongst our writing group, we have an ongoing joke, that if
you don’t describe what a person is wearing in a scene from the waist down, they are
clearly not wearing any pants (aka, “Porky-pigging it”)—and should be pictured
that way in scene. Maybe this is the case with the headless figure in the
drawing… maybe the fact all people have heads is implied and understood, but
then again—maybe sometimes it’s worth drawing in the details, being complete
and concrete in your descriptions.
But help me out here, I’m still wondering about the person
in the picture.
What’s his/her deal?
And why is their head missing?
-Mark
@manOwords
PS> Bonus questions:
- If you could be any animal, what would you be?
- What’s the best movie of all time?
- Who is your favorite member of Imagine Dragons?
Tuesday, June 13, 2017
The Helicopter Must Crash
I’m reading a book by Benjamin
Percy, called Thrill Me (Essays on
Fiction) and so far it’s, well, thrilling me (thanks for the
recommendation Nicola). Although I own several of his books like Red
Moon and The
Dead Lands in my literally eight-foot tall reading stack (the place
where good books go to be buried until an undisclosed future time when I’ll
actually read them), I haven’t read much of his work (he also writes comics,
too). But, what I’ve read so far in Thrill
Me is really connecting with me on a personal level. Part of this connection
is that I like to read and write horror—and many specific examples in Percy’s
book are about writing by Stephen King, Dean Koontz, and Cormack McCarthy—all
favorites of mine.
But, a particular section of his
book made me light up, and it’s all about this quote: “If a story does not
contain an exploding helicopter, an editor will not publish it, no matter how
pretty its sentences and orgasmic its epiphany may be.” He also goes on to say
“…helicopter is an inclusive term that may refer but is not limited to giant
sharks, robots with laser eyes, pirates, poltergeists, were-kittens….” [Gratuitous helicopter
explosion]
Of course, my book Sunlight (still in second revision,
headed to a third) contains, you guessed it, an exploding helicopter, with lots
of fire, shrieking monsters, and gunfire. Conclusion: There is commercial hope
for my writing yet. I’m also thinking about a were-kitten trilogy, FYI.
In one of my recent grad school writing classes I was assigned the book After Dark by
Haruki Murakami. This book takes place on one evening, between midnight and
seven a.m., and has a sometimes surreal and dreamlike quality. It mostly
focuses on a girl main character (Mari) who hangs out at a Denny’s and gets
involved with some other characters whose world is the night: prostitutes,
Chinese gangsters, young rock musicians, etc. There are a lot of things I liked
about this book: style of prose, commentary and deep thoughts about the human
condition (so intellectually stimulating), likeable characters (my favorite was
a female ex-wrestler), and at times some very cool, surreal moments.
What it didn’t have, for my personal
sensibilities as a reader and writer, was a driving plot or explicit action.
This book had a lot of great things to say, the writing was superb, but specifically there was a plot that I expected (based on the commercial books I
read, the movies I watch) that never unfolded. In the story there is a phone
that belongs to a man who beats up a Chinese prostitute… and other characters
in the book end up with this phone… and there is plenty of danger implied.
Having the phone could be construed (by the Chinese gangsters who manage the
beaten prostitute) as a direct connection to the beating—so in my mind I was
expecting a danger filled plot, where mistaken identity puts the main
character(s) in danger, running for their lives. But that never happened. In
other words, there was no helicopter, and it certainly did not explode.
I guess what I’m really
exploring here is the difference between commercial and literary fiction.
Although I read some literary fiction, and appreciate, admire and strive for
high quality prose writing, my true heart as a reader and writer defaults to
plot-driven (commercial/genre) fiction. I want something to happen, or a bunch
of somethings, something to keep the pages turning for the reader, wondering
what happens next.
One of the inspirations for my
book Sunlight was Cormac McCarthy’s The Road (and it makes me happy when
some of my “test” readers so far have pointed out some similarities to McCarthy's book.) In particular, after reading The
Road—a book I could not put down for how well it was structured, how
beautifully it was written, how suspenseful—I asked “but where were the monsters?” And thus
started my desire to write a similar story, but with monsters brought
prominently forward, where they deserve to be.
For you as a reader, if you had
to choose a book with either: strong, wonderful writing where not much happens--or an exciting, page flipping plot—which
would it be? And do the two have to be exclusive?
For you writers out there, I
ask, does your story have a helicopter crash? A fifty-story tall monster
stomping on military tanks? A kick-ass unicorn battling cave trolls? Maybe it
should.
Mark
Thursday, April 20, 2017
Character Assassination
Post originally published on Finding the Yummy.
What can ruin a good story for you?
For me, if I don't care about the characters, I won't care about the story. I felt that way while watching the film Public Enemies - John Dillinger was a horrible person, and I couldn't invest any energy in caring whether he was caught or betrayed or killed. His charisma wasn't enough to make me care, the cat-and-mouse game he was playing with the Feds wasn't enough to make me care, his Johnny Depp-ness wasn't enough to make me care. I was completely detached from the film, just waiting for it to end. (And trying to spot my friends Bill and Shannon Butler, who were swing dancing extras in the movie - the only thing that made watching it worthwhile.)
Likewise, I have a friend who hated La Femme Nikita, because the title character murders a cop in cold blood at the beginning of the film, and he couldn't forgive her for that. Never mind that the story was about transformation and redemption - and about how society says it's okay to be a monster, as long as you're a monster on the right side of the law. (Yeah, I loved it. But I get why he didn't. )
We all have sins we consider unforgivable.
I just finished reading Menfreya in the Morning, by Victoria Holt. It was written in the 1960s - a Daphnie du Maurier-style Gothic romance, set in the early 20th century.
I was liking it a lot, the style is spot on: sweeping rocky coasts, a glorious old manor gone to seed, horseback riding accidents, political scandals, rumors of a ghost in the east wing - the whole Gothicky works. The main character, Harriet, is likable: a lonely, odd, smart girl with a despised limp, who ends up capturing the heart of Bevil, the man she's been in love with since she was 10 and he was 20. He's a gorgeous Lothario, and the most eligible bachelor in all of Cornwall. Even after they get married about half way through the book, she can't really believe that he wants her - he's had a lot of affairs in the past and still flirts with women more beautiful than Harriet.
The marriage happens early on, because the rest of the the story is tres Rebecca: what with the dark suspicions about her husband's infidelity, the ghost in the east wing, the sinister governess and all. So, although they have an ideal honeymoon, when they get back, those little dreads begin to take hold. One night they have a major disagreement over Harriet's best friend, who is also Bevil's sister. After the argument, Harriet is furious with him, and announces that she's going to sleep in the other bedchamber. He says no, he wants her there with him. She refuses.
Aaaaannnnnd he rapes her. It isn't spelled out as such, but it's pretty clear what happens... her arms and back are covered in bruises the next day, and she describes it as "the most soul-shattering experience of her life."
Okay, I thought. Do I put the book down now? But Holt doesn't pull her punches. She takes care to express the rage, humiliation and fear Harriet feels, and especially the loss of her autonomy, the realization that whatever she wants, he's stronger, he's her husband, and she has no way of fighting back.
Meanwhile, there's a kind young man lurking vaguely in the background, and I started wondering whether Harriet was going to ultimately end up with him. Would her husband die? Then I thought, wow. This is a totally different book than I thought it was going to be.
EXCEPT IT'S NOT. Harriet makes excuses for her husband, and eventually learns that she was wrong about the sister, and he was right, and all her suspicions about Bevil's infidelities were unfounded, and he really just loves only her and she loves only him and those two crazy kids work it out, by gum.
Fuck you, 1966.
What story was ruined for you by a character's actions?
-Q
-Q
Labels:
books,
character,
Claudia,
Johnny Depp,
La Femme Nikita,
Menfreya in the Morning,
movies,
murder,
plot,
Public Enemies,
Q,
Rape,
Rebecca,
sin,
writing
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)